Device and method for operating a motor vehicle

ABSTRACT

Device and method for operating a vehicle using a vehicle controller to individually adjust braking forces of the wheels of at least one axle of the vehicle and using a yawing moment compensator to at least partially compensate for a yawing moment of the vehicle resulting from different braking forces of individual wheels of at least one axle by intervening in a steering of the vehicle, the action of the yawing moment compensator on the steering not being performed or only to a lesser degree while the vehicle controller is adjusting braking forces.

[0001] The present invention relates to a device and a method for operating a vehicle using a vehicle controller for individually adjusting braking forces of the wheels of at least one axle of the vehicle and using a yawing moment compensator to at least partially compensate for a yawing moment of the vehicle due to different braking forces of individual wheels of the at least one axle by intervening in a steering of the vehicle.

[0002] Today, braking systems such as hydraulic, electrohydraulic, pneumatic, electropneumatic, or electromechanical braking systems are increasingly electrically controllable. The electrical control permits a pressure build-up in the wheel brakes independent of the driver's braking intent, i.e. of the brake pedal operation by the driver. Such electrical controls of braking systems are used, for example, for implementing an anti-lock control (ABS, i.e., anti-lock (braking) system) or an electronic stability program (FDR or ESP).

[0003] The purpose of an anti-lock (braking) system (ABS) is to prevent the vehicle from slipping due to its wheels locking while braking, in particular on a slippery surface. For this purpose, when the driver operates the brake pedal for an extended period of time, sensors determine whether the individual wheels are locked, and whenever this is the case, the brake pressure on the corresponding wheel brakes is reduced. In such an anti-lock (braking) system, the front wheels of the vehicle are typically (but not necessarily) separately and consequently differently controlled, while the rear wheels are controlled together.

[0004] An electronic stability program (FDR or ESP) is used to monitor steering, braking, and gas pedal inputs by the driver in order to prevent the vehicle from slipping as a result of false inputs. In this context, false inputs are intercepted by targeted braking actions at the individual wheels.

[0005] Similar to braking systems controlled by electrical controls, steering systems may also be controlled by motor-driven steering systems. In this context, the power of a power source of an electromotor, for example, is able to be superimposed on the steering-wheel power applied by the driver, e.g. using a control element for the superimposed steering action. On the one hand, an effect supporting the steering-wheel power-of the driver is able to be achieved. On the other hand, steering signals that increase the driving safety and/or the driving comfort are able to be applied to the steering systems of the vehicle. Such a motor-driven steering system is described in DE 40 31 316 A1, for example.

[0006] A combination of a control of a braking system and of a steering system of a vehicle is described in EP 487 967 B1 (vehicle having an anti-lock controller). Reference is made to this patent with respect to the entire content. In short, a yawing moment compensation (GMK) for a vehicle equipped with an anti-lock (braking) system (ABS) is described in EP 487 967 B1. The yawing moment compensation determines a correction steering angle to compensate for the yawing moment of the vehicle occurring when braking on an inhomogeneous roadway (e.g. a μ-split) due to different braking forces on the left or right wheel(s).

[0007] The object of the present invention is to provide an improved method and an improved device for controlling a braking system and a steering system of a vehicle as well as a vehicle having the corresponding device.

[0008] This objective is achieved by a method according to claim 1 and a device according to claim 11. In this context, for operating a vehicle using a vehicle controller to individually adjust braking forces of the wheels of at least one axle of the vehicle and using a yawing moment compensator to at least partially compensate for a yawing moment of the vehicle resulting from different braking forces of individual wheels of at least one axle by intervening in a steering of the vehicle, the action of the yawing moment compensator on the steering is not performed or only to a lesser degree while braking forces are being adjusted by the vehicle controller.

[0009] This means in particular that the action of the yawing moment compensator on the steering is not performed while the vehicle controller is active.

[0010] In particular, the vehicle controller is part of an electronic stability program (FDR or ESP) especially as described, for example, in the article, FDR—FDR—The Operating Dynamics Regulation of Bosch, by A. van Zanten, R. Erhardt and G. Pfaff, Journal of Automobile Technology 96 (1994), 11 pages 674 to 689, and SAE paper 973184, Vehicle Dynamics Controller for Commercial Vehicles, by F. Hecker, S. Hummel, O. Jundt, K.-D. Leimbach, I. Faye, and H. Schramm. In this context, the vehicle controller is advantageously designed for adjusting the braking forces as a function of the yaw rate of the vehicle and a setpoint yaw rate of the vehicle, in particular as a function of the difference between the yaw rate of the vehicle and the setpoint yaw rate of the vehicle. In this context, the braking forces are advantageously adjusted by calculating the setpoint slip values for the wheels that are advantageously input quantities in secondary control loops.

[0011] The intervention of the yawing moment compensator in the steering is advantageously reduced by at least one filter.

[0012] In a further advantageous refinement of the present invention, the axle is the front and/or the rear axle.

[0013] In another advantageous refinement of the present invention, the action on a steering of the vehicle is performed using a compensation steering angle determined as a function of the braking forces of individual wheels.

[0014] In a further advantageous refinement of the present invention, a compensation steering angle dependent on a difference of separately controlled braking pressures of the front and/or rear wheels is adjusted at a rear-wheel steering system or is superimposed on a front-wheel or rear-wheel steering angle in order to at least partially compensate for the yawing moment of the vehicle.

[0015] In this context, the braking pressures are used as advantageous substitute quantities for the braking forces.

[0016] In another advantageous refinement of the present invention, the value of the compensation steering angle is set to zero in a predefined or variable range of small braking pressure differences, i.e. within a dead zone, and to a value not equaling zero outside of the dead zone.

[0017] The values for the dead zone are advantageously different for the front and rear axle.

[0018] In another advantageous refinement of the present invention, separate partial compensation steering angles are determined in each case for the front wheels and the rear wheels, the compensation steering angle being determined as a function of the partial compensation steering angles.

[0019] In a further advantageous refinement of the present invention, the compensation steering angle is determined by adding the partial compensation steering angles.

[0020] In another advantageous refinement of the present invention, at least one partial compensation steering angle is determined after the dead zone is exceeded by adding the product of a constant and the initial value of the dead zone and the product of a variable amplification and the initial value of the dead zone.

[0021] In a further advantageous refinement of the present invention, the compensation steering angle is stored when braking forces are adjusted by the vehicle controller.

[0022] In another advantageous refinement of the present invention, the stored compensation steering angle is essentially continuously transferred after the completion of the adjustment of the braking forces via the vehicle controller to an instantaneous compensation steering angle.

[0023] Further advantages result from the following description of the exemplary embodiments of the present invention, with reference to the figures. The individual figures show:

[0024]FIG. 1 shows a block diagram of a technical field that is improved by an exemplary embodiment of the present invention;

[0025]FIG. 2 shows a diagram of the block diagram in FIG. 1;

[0026]FIG. 3 shows a diagram of the block diagram in FIG. 1;

[0027]FIG. 4 shows a diagram of the block diagram in FIG. 1;

[0028]FIG. 5 shows a block diagram of a modified technical field that is improved by an exemplary embodiment of the present invention;

[0029]FIG. 6 shows a block diagram of an exemplary embodiment of the present invention; and

[0030]FIG. 7 shows a diagram of the exemplary embodiment in FIG. 6.

[0031] In the following, a technical field, which is improved by an exemplary embodiment of the present invention, is first explained by way of example on the basis of FIGS. 1 through 5. An exemplary embodiment of the present invention is then described on the basis of FIGS. 6 and 7.

[0032] The present example of a technical field in FIG. 1 explains the compensation for the brake yawing moment by a rear axle steering for a select-low braked rear axle.

[0033] The braking pressures in the front wheels supply in a first approximation a measure of the used braking force, the difference Δp of the pressures consequently supplies a measure for the brake yawing moment. Rear-axle steering angle δ produces an opposing moment about vertical vehicle axle that compensates for the brake yawing moment given a suitable design. The steady-state relationship between δ and Δp is described by proportionality factor k_(p).

[0034] Since the brake pressures are constantly modulated during an ABS braking, a rear axle steering control having only the abovementioned proportionality would react very irregularly. Therefore, a filtering is provided before the pressure difference is calculated. This difference must first overcome a significant threshold (dead zone) before the control becomes active; this measure is also intended to prevent steering irregularity in the case of small disturbances.

[0035] Measured braking pressures P_(vl and P) _(vr) are filtered in two stages.

[0036] Disturbances caused by measuring noise (peaks, A/D errors) are to be suppressed in pre-filter 1, 1′ by variably restricting the pressure change rate. The increase limit remains at smaller values when there is frequent change of pressure build-up and decrease. Given a change having the same sign over a longer period of time, the increase limit is continuously increased to a maximum value.

[0037] Decay filters 2 and 2′ are specially designed for the relationships between ABS control cycles (ABS control cycles with series of pulses) and rear-wheel steering. So that the rear-wheel steering angle does not directly follow the pressure jumps in particular in the pressure reduction phases, a decrease of the filtered braking pressures is only allowed very slowly during the first pressure reduction after a pressure increase phase. After a predefined time (e.g. 100 ms) elapses, the time constant of the low pass is switched over so that the filtered value (output of block 2 or 2′) approaches the output quantities of pre-filter 1 (1′) more quickly.

[0038] The measured pressure as well as the intermediate value and the filtered pressure are shown in FIG. 2.

[0039] According to this, the difference of the output quantities of filters 2 and 2′ is formed from filtered braking pressures P_(vlf) and P_(vrf) in a subtracter circuit 3, the difference supplying after a dead zone 4 is exceeded input quantities f(Δp) for control amplifiers 5 and 6 whose output signals are added in adder 7 to form steering angle δ.

[0040] The control is essentially made up of a constant proportion

bp=f(Δp)·k _(p) (Block 5).

[0041] As a result of the filtering, the dead zone, and the dynamic response (characteristic) of the steering controller, a yawing motion first builds up which is also maintained in the case of an ideal design of amplification k_(p). Therefore, a time-variable proportion is also calculated at the start of the control action:

δ_(v) =f(Δp)·k _(v) (Block 6)

[0042] Factor k_(v) is set to a certain value when the difference of the filtered pressures exceeds the dead zone and then continually decays.

[0043] Therefore, when the control is switched in, the rear-wheel steering angle is noticeably increased, so that the yaw rate changes its sign and the yaw angle is consequently reduced again. In this case, the driver practically no longer needs to intervene. Viewed over the entire braking action, the yaw rate only assumes very small values, i.e., the irregularities are largely compensated for by the ABS control cycles.

[0044] The yawing moment compensation prevents the vehicle from breaking away at low speeds as well as at high speeds. Its support becomes clearer as the speed increases.

[0045] In tests with a fixedly held steering wheel, the track displacement remains quite small, and a yaw angle builds very slowly.

[0046] As already said above, the measurement used to date of the front wheel brake pressures may also be replaced by an estimation algorithm. One is described in patent application P 4030724.7, which is included in EP 486 967 B1 as an appendix. In this context, the filtering of the braking pressures is able to be simplified such that blocks 1, 1′ are eliminated.

[0047] It is possible to influence the front-wheel steering angle according to the same principle. Only quantitative differences arise.

[0048] Given different friction coefficients on different vehicle sides, introducing the time-variable amplification results in significant advantages yet causes an oversteering behavior of the vehicle when fully braking in a curve. To prevent this disadvantage, the transversal acceleration of the vehicle is also taken in to account. However, considering the transversal acceleration as described does not presuppose acquiring the steering angle according to the top branch in FIG. 1.

[0049] A correction factor K_(by), which is multiplicatively linked to the rear-wheel angle (in 12), is first determined from measured transversal acceleration b_(y) via the characteristic curve (block 8) shown in FIG. 3.

[0050] This characteristic curve causes the compensation to not be influenced (K_(by)=1) in the case of low transversal accelerations, e.g. less than 2 m/s², thereby resulting in a reduction proportional to the transversal acceleration, and causes the compensation to be completely suppressed (K_(by)=0) in the case of a very high transversal acceleration, e.g. above 8 m/s². This characteristic curve is based on the knowledge that in the case of μ-split braking, the occurring transversal accelerations are approximately in the range of +/−2 m/s².

[0051] Only this characteristic curve is not sufficient. Fluctuations in the transversal acceleration for values b_(y)>2 m/s² (e.g. sign change of by during lane change while braking) result in proportional fluctuations of the correction factor and consequently of the rear-wheel steering angle that are noticeable as an irregularity. In addition, it is disadvantageous that these steering-angle fluctuations then effect the b_(y) signal. A suitable filtering of the correction factor is therefore necessary. However, it must ensure that when building up a transversal acceleration, the GMK is quickly reduced. However, during certain driving maneuvers, e.g. lane changes, an intervention is not carried out again too quickly. This is achieved using two alternative low pass filters 10 and 11 having very different time constants. As such, the transversal acceleration-dependent steering angle correction has the form shown in FIG. 1 in blocks 8, 9, 10, and 11.

[0052] Typical values for the time constants of the two alternative low pass filters are 10 ms and 1000 ms, respectively.

[0053] Blocks 9, 10, and 11 are to symbolize the following situation. If the transversal acceleration increases and Kb_(y) becomes smaller, low pass filter 10 having the small time constant becomes active, i.e., output value Kb_(y) quickly follows the input from block 8 and decreases the steering angle. If however the transversal acceleration decreases and Kb_(y) consequently increases, Kb_(y) follows the input value from block 8 but in a delayed manner.

[0054] These measures reduce the yawing moment compensation when braking on curves and changing lanes while braking on high coefficients of friction. The remaining portions of rear-wheel steering angle δ_(GMK) from the compensation no longer have a negative effect on the vehicle performance.

[0055] The measured transversal acceleration may be replaced by a quantity subsequently formed from the steering angles and the vehicle speed (e.g. tacho signal). When considered in a steady-state manner, the following relationship for the transversal acceleration is able to be derived from the known linear single-track model: $b_{y,\quad {stat}} = {\frac{V_{x}^{2}\left( {\delta_{v} - \delta_{h}} \right)}{l_{o}}\frac{1}{1 + \left( {V_{X}/V_{ch}} \right)^{2}}}$

[0056] where:

[0057] V_(x) longitudinal vehicle speed

[0058] δ_(v) front-wheel steering angle

[0059] δ_(h) rear-wheel steering angle

[0060] l_(o) wheel base

[0061] V_(ch) characteristic speed

[0062] B_(y,stat) estimated steady-state acceleration

[0063] In this context V_(ch) is made up of the model parameters as follows: $V_{ch} = \sqrt{\frac{1}{\frac{m}{l_{0}^{2}}\left( {\frac{l_{h}}{C_{v}} - \frac{l_{v}}{C_{h}}} \right)}}$

[0064] where

[0065] m Vehicle weight

[0066]1 _(v) Distance from center of gravity—front axle

[0067] l_(h) Distance from center of gravity—rear axle

[0068] C_(v) Slip angle rigidity—front axle

[0069] C_(h) Slip angle rigidity—rear axle

[0070] Using the parameters of a certain model results in a value of V_(ch) of about 20 m/s.

[0071] In the case of a transient driving maneuver (changing lanes while braking), it turns out that steady-state equation (1), which is adjusted to cornering, delivers transversal accelerations that are too high. For this reason, a dynamic member (low pass filter having time constant T_(bys)), which takes the vehicle dynamics into consideration, is connected in series (block 13).

[0072] When implementing equation (1) in the computing device, it offers itself to store the portion $\frac{V_{x}^{2}}{l_{o}}\frac{1}{1 + \left( {V_{X}/V_{ch}} \right)^{2}}$

[0073] as a speed-dependent characteristic curve (block 14). Equation (1) is consequently reduced to the interpolation of a characteristic curve (in block 14) as well as the multiplication of the result by the difference (δ_(v)−δ_(h)) (in block 15). The total transversal acceleration correction consequently has the form shown in the middle branch in FIG. 1.

[0074] When estimating the transversal acceleration as shown above, rear-wheel steering angle δ_(h) is included as an input quantity. At the same time, the estimation has a reciprocal effect on part of the rear-wheel steering angle, namely the GMK part. So that no feedback effects are able to occur in this context, only the portion of the rear-wheel steering angle coming from another rear-wheel steering control is taken into consideration as an input quantity of the transversal acceleration estimation.

[0075] To suppress the amplified turning-in at the end of a curve braking by the yawing moment compensation, an amplification factor K_(Vx) dependent on the vehicle speed is multiplicatively superimposed.

[0076] Its exemplary characteristic curve is stored in block 16 and shown in FIG. 4. Over 50 km/h, for example, the amplification factor remains unchanged at one, and in the range of 50 km/h to 20 km/h, for example, it is continuously reduced to zero. This measure is less important for U-split braking, since vehicles having ABS do not show any manageability problems in lower speed ranges.

[0077] This additional factor K_(Vx) is multiplicatively considered in multiplier 12. Therefore, the steering angle for the yawing moment compensation as a whole is:

δ_(GMK) =K _(by) ·K _(Vx)·δ.

[0078] A variable dead zone 4′ differentiates the block diagram of a modified technical field in FIG. 5 from that in FIG. 1. In this context, filtered braking pressures P_(vlf) and P_(vrf) are multiplied together by a multiplier 20. The product of P_(vlf) and P_(vrf) is multiplied by a correction factor K_(th) and added to a predefined limiting value P_(to) to form a corrected limiting value P_(toth).

[0079] The example of a technical field described using FIGS. 1 through 5 that is improved by an exemplary embodiment of the present invention starts out from a vehicle having an anti-lock (braking) system (ABS) in which the braking pressures of the rear wheels are not individually regulated. This is often sufficient for the purposes of a simple-anti-lock (braking) system (ABS) so that provision is typically not made for an individual control of the braking pressures of the rear wheels for commercially available anti-lock (braking) systems (ABS). Consequently, braking pressure differences only occur at the wheels of the front axle and only need to be considered there.

[0080] Something different is true for vehicles equipped with an electronic stability program (FDR or ESP). In this instance, within the framework of the electronic stability program, braking pressures of the wheels of both axles are individually regulated at least intermittently. In this context, different braking pressures are set in a targeted manner at each wheel of an axle in order to influence the vehicle motion.

[0081] These conditions are considered in the exemplary embodiment of the present invention shown in FIG. 6. In this context, the variant from FIG. 5 having a variable dead zone 4′ is presupposed. Of course, the present invention may also be used for the variant from FIG. 1 having a fixed dead zone. In this manner, it is achieved that yawing moment compensation (GMK) only reacts to braking pressure differences in an anti-lock braking system (ABS) and is not also dependent on a vehicle controller of a electronic stability program (FDR or ESP).

[0082] In comparison with the variant in FIG. 5, yawing moment compensation (GMK) is expanded in FIG. 6 by two parts:

[0083] The first expansion, which is shown in the upper left portion of FIG. 6, is used for considering the braking pressure differences of the wheels of the rear axle. For this purpose, another branch was added to the block diagram that essentially corresponds to the top branch in FIG. 5 (or FIG. 1). Therefore, the same components in the representation are designated by the same reference numerals, and only “h” for the rear axle and “v” for the front axle were added.

[0084] The braking pressures of rear wheels P_(hl) and P_(hr) are able to be measured or-estimated as described above for the braking pressures of front wheels P_(vl), P_(vr). They are then treated essentially in the same manner as the braking pressures of front wheels P_(vl), P_(vr). Consequently, they are filtered in pre-filters and decay filters 1 _(h), 1 _(h)′, 2 _(h), 2 _(h)′. The difference of filtered braking pressures P_(hlf), P_(hrf) is determined in a subtracter circuit 3 _(h). If the difference of filtered pressures P_(hlf), P_(hrf) exceeds a dead zone 4, which is dependent on the total pressure level or is predefined in a fixed manner, a partial compensation steering angle δ_(GMKh) is determined. A steering angle determined from the braking pressures of the wheels of the front axle as described above is added as an additional partial compensation steering angle δ_(GMKv) to partial compensation steering angle δ_(GMKh) of the braking pressures of the wheels of the rear axle to form a rear and/or front axle steering angle δ_(ideal).

[0085] Mainly the following points differentiate the treatment of braking pressures P_(hl), P_(hr) of the rear wheels from the treatment of braking pressures P_(vl), P_(vr) of the front wheels: Other parameters may be selected for the filters and the dead zone as well as another value for the constant amplification. Such different parameters may take into account e.g. the different design or the different size of the brakes, i.e., a different connection between braking pressure and braking force at the front or rear axle. Furthermore, such different parameters may take into account a possibly different track width of the front and rear axle or different ABS strategies.

[0086] Moreover, the time-variable amplification of the braking pressure difference (block 6 in FIGS. 1 and 5) may be eliminated. This is possible since in the case of an ABS action within a on a electronic stability program (FDR), the braking pressure difference of the rear wheels is regularly controlled such that it only increases slowly. On the other hand, a time-variable amplification of the braking pressure difference of the rear wheels may also be useful and used accordingly.

[0087] Due to the indicated differences when treating the rear and front braking pressures P_(hl), P_(hr), and P_(vl), P_(vr), it is advantageous to first form each difference separately as shown in FIG. 6. Subsequently, partial compensation steering angles δ_(GMKv), δ_(GMKv) are added to form total rear or front axle steering angle intervention δ_(ideal).

[0088] The thus obtained rear or front axle steering angle intervention δ_(ideal) may generally correspond to the steering angle for the yawing moment compensation. However, as described above, transversal acceleration b_(y) and the speed of the vehicle are also advantageously considered. For this purpose, specified correction factors K_(by) and K_(vx) are applied to front or rear axle steering angle δ_(ideal). The thus obtained instantaneous compensation steering angle δ_(A) is set for yawing moment compensation at the rear axle or is superimposed on a steering angle of the front or rear axle.

[0089] The second expansion is used to ensure that yawing moment compensation (GMK) only reacts to braking pressure differences from an anti-lock braking system (ABS) and not as a function of a driving dynamics controller. A signal indicating when interventions of the vehicle controller occur is provided for this purpose. The fact that interventions of the vehicle controller exist is typically indicated in electronic stability programs in the form of a flag that is able to assume the values zero and one, for example. Therefore, it only needs to be transmitted to the control of yawing moment compensation (GMK). A selector 50 is provided for processing signal F.

[0090] Preferably, this expansion causes yawing moment compensation (GMK) to be switched off when interventions of the vehicle controller occur. An already applied compensation steering angle δ_(A) is maintained during a subsequent intervention of the vehicle-controller and is then essentially continuously transferred to an instantaneous compensation steering angle δ_(A).

[0091] For this purpose, a factor K_(H) is first formed from flag F of the vehicle controller via a block 52 by a switching-off filter 30. The value of factor K_(H) always equals one when flag F is set, i.e. equals one. If flag F zeros, the value of factor K_(H) tends to zero with a predefined time response. Such a relationship is shown by way of example in FIG. 7. In this example, the value of factor K_(H) tends to zero in a linear manner in a time Δt. Alternatively, an exponential transition may also be used.

[0092] With the help of thus obtained factor K_(H), the front-axle steering angle δ_(GMK) to be ultimately applied or at the steered axle for yawing moment compensation is determined by a block 53 in accordance with the following equation:

δ_(GMK)=(1−K _(H))·δ_(A) +K _(H) ·δ _(H)

[0093] where

[0094] δ_(A)=the intantaneous compensation steering angle in each case

[0095] δ_(H)=a compensation steering angle maintained during an intervention of the vehicle controller.

[0096] A controllable sample-and-hold member 51 is used to obtain constant compensation steering angle δ_(H). It is switched such that it assumes in each case instantaneous compensation steering angle δ_(A) (sample). As long as factor K_(H) equals zero, sample-and-hold member 51 also outputs this instantaneous compensation steering angle δ_(A) in each case as an output value (i.e. δ_(A)=δ_(H)). However, as soon as factor K_(H) is greater than zero, the value of compensation steering angle δ_(A) applied last is frozen (hold) and constant compensation steering angle δ_(H) is consequently generated and output. As soon as factor K_(H) again assumes the value zero, constant compensation steering angle δ_(H) is no longer maintained, etc.

[0097] As long as factor K_(H) equals zero, i.e., as long as there are no interventions of the vehicle controller, the above equation simplifies to:

δ_(GMK)=(1−0)·δ_(A)+0·δ_(H)=δ_(A)

[0098] Therefore, the yawing moment compensations necessary in each case are performed unchanged in accordance with the above description.

[0099] As soon as there is an intervention of the vehicle controller, factor K_(H) equals one. Consequently, the above equation becomes:

δ_(GMK)=(1−1)·δ_(A)+1·δ_(H)=δ_(H)

[0100] i.e., the compensation angle δ_(A) last applied before the intervention of the vehicle controller is maintained as a constant compensation angle δ_(H) and continues to be applied during the intervention.

[0101] As soon as the intervention of the vehicle controller is finally completed, factor K_(H) is continuously transferred rear to the value zero during a time Δt. During this time, constant compensation angle δ_(H) continues to be maintained and resulting compensation angle δ_(GMK) is calculated as explained above:

δ_(GMK)=(1−K _(H))·δ_(A) +K _(H·δ) _(H)

[0102] In this manner, the compensation angle δ_(H) maintained during the intervention of the vehicle controller and also applied during this time as resulting compensation angle δ_(GMK) is continuously transferred to the value of the instantaneous compensation angle δ_(A) actually needed in each case after the intervention of the electronic stability program (FDR or ESP) to compensate for the yawing moment.

[0103] Another possibility for preventing yawing moment compensation (GMK) from counteracting its vehicle controller is to significantly filter instantaneous intervention angle δ_(A) of yawing moment compensation (GMK) as long as the interventions of the vehicle controller are taking place. Consequently, the driving dynamics interventions in the higher frequency range are not affected by yawing moment compensation (GMK).

[0104] In comparison with the exemplarily described technical field, the described exemplary embodiment has the particular advantage that yawing moment reductions (GMA) to be considered by the anti-lock (braking) system (ABS) integrated in the electronic stability program (FDR or ESP) according to the related art are able to be significantly reduced at the front axle as well as at the rear axle. A transition may also be made to individual ABS interventions at the rear axle already at a higher speed. This results in a shorter braking distance. Furthermore, other steering actions may superimpose the yawing moment compensation interventions. Measured or estimated braking pressures that are preferably already available from the electronic stability program (FDR or ESP) may be used as input information for the yawing moment compensation.

[0105] The above-described exemplary embodiments are only used to improve the understandability of the present invention. They are not intended as a restriction. Therefore, it is understood that all additional possible specific embodiments are within the framework of the present invention. In particular, it is understood that the present invention also includes a device for implementing the described method and a vehicle equipped with such a device.

LIST OF REFERENCE NUMERALS

[0106] δ, δ_(ideal) Rear-axle and/or front-axle steering angle

[0107] Δ_(A) Compensation steering angle

[0108] δ_(GMKv), δ_(GMKv) Partial compensation steering angle

[0109] ΔP Pressure difference

[0110] k_(p) Proportionality factor

[0111] k_(v) Factor

[0112] P_(vl), P_(vr) Braking pressures of the front wheels

[0113] P_(vlf), P_(vrf) Filtered braking pressures of the front wheels

[0114] P_(hl), P_(hr) Braking pressures of the rear wheels

[0115] P_(hlf), P_(hrf) Filtered braking pressures of the rear wheels

[0116] b_(y) Transversal acceleration

[0117] K_(by) Correction factor

[0118] K_(by) Amplification factor

[0119] P_(tot) Predefined limiting value

[0120] K_(th) Correction factor

[0121] P_(toth) Corrected limiting value

[0122] F Flag

[0123] K_(H) Weight factor

[0124] S/H Sample-and-hold member

[0125]1,1′ Pre-filter

[0126]2,2′ Decay filter

[0127]3 Subtracter circuit

[0128]4 Dead zone or dead zone

[0129]4′ Variable dead zone or dead zone

[0130]5,6 Control amplifiers or block

[0131]7 Adder

[0132]8 Characteristic curve of block

[0133]9

[0134]10,11 alternative low pass filters

[0135]12 multiplier

[0136]13 dynamic member

[0137]14 speed-dependent characteristic curve

[0138]20 multiplier

[0139]30 triggering filter 

What is claimed is:
 1. A method for operating a vehicle using a vehicle controller to individually adjust braking forces of the wheels of at least one axle of the vehicle and using a yawing moment compensator to at least partially compensate for a yawing moment of the vehicle resulting from different braking forces of individual wheels of the at least one axle by intervening in a steering of the vehicle, wherein the action of the yawing moment compensator on the steering is not performed or only to a lesser degree when the vehicle controller is adjusting braking forces.
 2. The method as recited in claim 1, wherein the axle is the front and/or the rear axle.
 3. The method as recited in claim 1 or 2, wherein the action on a steering of the vehicle is performed using a compensation steering angle determined as a function of the braking forces of individual wheels.
 4. The method as recited in claim 1, 2, or 3, wherein a compensation steering angle (δ, δ_(ideal), δ_(GMK), δ_(A), δ_(H)) dependent on a difference (ΔP) of separately controlled braking pressures (P_(vl), P_(vr), P_(hl), P_(hr)) of the front and/or rear wheels is adjusted at one rear-wheel steering system or is superimposed on a front-wheel or rear-wheel steering angle to at least partially compensate for the yawing moment of the vehicle.
 5. The method as recited in claim 4, wherein the value of the compensation steering angle (δ, δ_(ideal), δ_(GMK), δ_(A), δ_(H)) is set to zero in a predefined or variable range of small braking pressure differences (ΔP), called the dead zone in the Specification, and is set to a value not equaling zero outside of the dead zone.
 6. The method as recited in one of claims 3, 4, or 5, wherein in each case separate partial compensation steering angles (δ_(GMKV) and δ_(GMKh)) are determined for the front wheels and the rear wheels, and the compensation steering angle (δ, δ_(ideal), δ_(GMK), δ_(A), δ_(H)) is determined as a function of the partial compensation steering angles (δ_(GMKV) and δ_(GMKh)).
 7. The method as recited in claim 6, wherein the compensation steering angle (δ, δ_(ideal), δ_(GMK), δ_(A), δ_(H)) is determined by adding the partial compensation steering angles (δ_(GMKV) and δ_(GMKh)).
 8. The method as recited in one of the preceding claims, wherein at least one partial compensation steering angle (δ_(GMKV) or δ_(GMKh)) is determined after the dead zone is exceeded by adding the product of a constant and the initial value of the dead zone and the product of a variable amplification and the initial value of the dead zone.
 9. The method as recited in one of claims 3 through 8, wherein the compensation steering angle (δ_(A)) is stored while the vehicle controller is adjusting braking forces.
 10. The method as recited in claim 9, wherein the stored compensation steering angle (δ_(H)) is essentially continuously transferred to an instantaneous compensation steering angle (δ_(A), δ_(A)′) after the vehicle controller finishes adjusting the braking forces.
 11. A device for operating a vehicle having a vehicle controller for individually adjusting braking forces of the wheels of at least one axle of the vehicle and a yawing moment compensator for at least partially compensating for a yawing moment of the vehicle resulting from different braking forces of individual wheels of the at least one axle by intervening in a steering of the vehicle, in particular for operating a vehicle in accordance with a method as recited in one of the preceding claims, wherein the device for operating a vehicle has a selector (50) for preventing or reducing the action of the yawing moment compensator on the steering when the vehicle controller is adjusting braking forces. 